Skip to main content
Search for Indicators

Poverty and Income

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

Health / Disabilities

Health / Disabilities

Health / Disabilities

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty

Value
Compared to:

Health / Disabilities

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty

Value
Compared to:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty County: Lake

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty County: Lake

31.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 31.8% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.1%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 31.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (22.7%), Lake has a value of 31.8% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(22.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Lake has a value of 31.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Lake value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place: Clearlake

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place: Clearlake

44.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Clearlake has a value of 44.8% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,327 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Clearlake has a value of 44.8% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.9% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,025 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (31.8%), Clearlake has a value of 44.8% which is higher and worse.
Lake, CA County Value
(31.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Compared to the CA Value (22.7%), Clearlake has a value of 44.8% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(22.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Clearlake has a value of 44.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Clearlake value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place: Clearlake Oaks

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place: Clearlake Oaks

26.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Clearlake Oaks has a value of 26.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,327 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Clearlake Oaks has a value of 26.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.9% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,025 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (31.8%), Clearlake Oaks has a value of 26.2% which is lower and better.
Lake, CA County Value
(31.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Compared to the CA Value (22.7%), Clearlake Oaks has a value of 26.2% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(22.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Clearlake Oaks has a value of 26.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Clearlake Oaks value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place: Clearlake Riviera

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place: Clearlake Riviera

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Clearlake Riviera has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,327 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Clearlake Riviera has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.9% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,025 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (31.8%), Clearlake Riviera has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Lake, CA County Value
(31.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Compared to the CA Value (22.7%), Clearlake Riviera has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(22.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Clearlake Riviera has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Clearlake Riviera value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place: Cobb

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place: Cobb

33.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Cobb has a value of 33.8% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,327 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Cobb has a value of 33.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.9% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,025 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (31.8%), Cobb has a value of 33.8% which is higher and worse.
Lake, CA County Value
(31.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Compared to the CA Value (22.7%), Cobb has a value of 33.8% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(22.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Cobb has a value of 33.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Cobb value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place: Hidden Valley Lake

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place: Hidden Valley Lake

8.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Hidden Valley Lake has a value of 8.4% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,327 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Hidden Valley Lake has a value of 8.4% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.9% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,025 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (31.8%), Hidden Valley Lake has a value of 8.4% which is lower and better.
Lake, CA County Value
(31.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Compared to the CA Value (22.7%), Hidden Valley Lake has a value of 8.4% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(22.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Hidden Valley Lake has a value of 8.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hidden Valley Lake value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place: Kelseyville

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place: Kelseyville

37.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Kelseyville has a value of 37.1% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,327 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Kelseyville has a value of 37.1% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.9% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,025 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (31.8%), Kelseyville has a value of 37.1% which is higher and worse.
Lake, CA County Value
(31.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Compared to the CA Value (22.7%), Kelseyville has a value of 37.1% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(22.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Kelseyville has a value of 37.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Kelseyville value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place: Lakeport

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place: Lakeport

33.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Lakeport has a value of 33.1% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,327 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Lakeport has a value of 33.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.9% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,025 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (31.8%), Lakeport has a value of 33.1% which is higher and worse.
Lake, CA County Value
(31.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Compared to the CA Value (22.7%), Lakeport has a value of 33.1% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(22.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Lakeport has a value of 33.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Lakeport value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place: Lower Lake

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place: Lower Lake

76.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Lower Lake has a value of 76.6% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,327 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Lower Lake has a value of 76.6% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.9% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,025 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (31.8%), Lower Lake has a value of 76.6% which is higher and worse.
Lake, CA County Value
(31.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Compared to the CA Value (22.7%), Lower Lake has a value of 76.6% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(22.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Lower Lake has a value of 76.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Lower Lake value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place: Lucerne

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place: Lucerne

22.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Lucerne has a value of 22.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,327 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Lucerne has a value of 22.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.9% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,025 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (31.8%), Lucerne has a value of 22.2% which is lower and better.
Lake, CA County Value
(31.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Compared to the CA Value (22.7%), Lucerne has a value of 22.2% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(22.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Lucerne has a value of 22.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Lucerne value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place: Middletown

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place: Middletown

14.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Middletown has a value of 14.1% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,327 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Middletown has a value of 14.1% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.9% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,025 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (31.8%), Middletown has a value of 14.1% which is lower and better.
Lake, CA County Value
(31.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Compared to the CA Value (22.7%), Middletown has a value of 14.1% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(22.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Middletown has a value of 14.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Middletown value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place: Nice

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place: Nice

12.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Nice has a value of 12.8% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,327 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Nice has a value of 12.8% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.9% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,025 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (31.8%), Nice has a value of 12.8% which is lower and better.
Lake, CA County Value
(31.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Compared to the CA Value (22.7%), Nice has a value of 12.8% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(22.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Nice has a value of 12.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Nice value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place: North Lakeport

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place: North Lakeport

8.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, North Lakeport has a value of 8.7% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,327 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, North Lakeport has a value of 8.7% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.9% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,025 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (31.8%), North Lakeport has a value of 8.7% which is lower and better.
Lake, CA County Value
(31.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Compared to the CA Value (22.7%), North Lakeport has a value of 8.7% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(22.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), North Lakeport has a value of 8.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the North Lakeport value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place: Soda Bay

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place: Soda Bay

27.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Soda Bay has a value of 27.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,327 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Soda Bay has a value of 27.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.9% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,025 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (31.8%), Soda Bay has a value of 27.8% which is lower and better.
Lake, CA County Value
(31.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Compared to the CA Value (22.7%), Soda Bay has a value of 27.8% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(22.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Soda Bay has a value of 27.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Soda Bay value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place: Spring Valley

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place: Spring Valley

31.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Spring Valley has a value of 31.7% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,327 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Spring Valley has a value of 31.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.9% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,025 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (31.8%), Spring Valley has a value of 31.7% which is lower and better.
Lake, CA County Value
(31.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Compared to the CA Value (22.7%), Spring Valley has a value of 31.7% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(22.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Spring Valley has a value of 31.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Spring Valley value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place: Upper Lake

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place: Upper Lake

60.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Upper Lake has a value of 60.0% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,327 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Upper Lake has a value of 60.0% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.9% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,025 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (31.8%), Upper Lake has a value of 60.0% which is higher and worse.
Lake, CA County Value
(31.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Compared to the CA Value (22.7%), Upper Lake has a value of 60.0% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(22.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Upper Lake has a value of 60.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Upper Lake value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Zip Code: 95422

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Zip Code: 95422

44.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95422 has a value of 44.4% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,625 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95422 has a value of 44.4% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.8% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.0%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,884 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (31.8%), 95422 has a value of 44.4% which is higher and worse.
Lake, CA County Value
(31.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Over time, the 95422 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Zip Code: 95423

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Zip Code: 95423

28.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95423 has a value of 28.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,625 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95423 has a value of 28.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.8% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.0%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,884 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (31.8%), 95423 has a value of 28.5% which is lower and better.
Lake, CA County Value
(31.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Over time, the 95423 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Zip Code: 95426

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Zip Code: 95426

22.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95426 has a value of 22.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,625 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95426 has a value of 22.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.8% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.0%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,884 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (31.8%), 95426 has a value of 22.2% which is lower and better.
Lake, CA County Value
(31.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Over time, the 95426 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Zip Code: 95443

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Zip Code: 95443

100.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95443 has a value of 100.0% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,625 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95443 has a value of 100.0% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.8% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.0%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,884 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (31.8%), 95443 has a value of 100.0% which is higher and worse.
Lake, CA County Value
(31.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Over time, the 95443 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Zip Code: 95451

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Zip Code: 95451

21.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95451 has a value of 21.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,625 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95451 has a value of 21.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.8% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.0%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,884 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (31.8%), 95451 has a value of 21.9% which is lower and better.
Lake, CA County Value
(31.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Over time, the 95451 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Zip Code: 95453

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Zip Code: 95453

33.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95453 has a value of 33.8% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,625 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95453 has a value of 33.8% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.8% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.0%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,884 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (31.8%), 95453 has a value of 33.8% which is higher and worse.
Lake, CA County Value
(31.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Over time, the 95453 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Zip Code: 95457

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Zip Code: 95457

69.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95457 has a value of 69.5% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,625 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95457 has a value of 69.5% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.8% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.0%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,884 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (31.8%), 95457 has a value of 69.5% which is higher and worse.
Lake, CA County Value
(31.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Over time, the 95457 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Zip Code: 95458

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Zip Code: 95458

19.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95458 has a value of 19.5% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,625 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95458 has a value of 19.5% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.8% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.0%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,884 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (31.8%), 95458 has a value of 19.5% which is lower and better.
Lake, CA County Value
(31.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Over time, the 95458 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Zip Code: 95461

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Zip Code: 95461

14.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95461 has a value of 14.9% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,625 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95461 has a value of 14.9% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.8% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.0%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,884 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (31.8%), 95461 has a value of 14.9% which is lower and better.
Lake, CA County Value
(31.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Over time, the 95461 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Zip Code: 95464

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Zip Code: 95464

13.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95464 has a value of 13.9% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,625 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95464 has a value of 13.9% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.8% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.0%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,884 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (31.8%), 95464 has a value of 13.9% which is lower and better.
Lake, CA County Value
(31.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Over time, the 95464 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Zip Code: 95467

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Zip Code: 95467

8.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95467 has a value of 8.8% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,625 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95467 has a value of 8.8% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.8% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.0%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,884 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (31.8%), 95467 has a value of 8.8% which is lower and better.
Lake, CA County Value
(31.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Over time, the 95467 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Zip Code: 95485

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Zip Code: 95485

30.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95485 has a value of 30.4% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,625 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95485 has a value of 30.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.8% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.0%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,884 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (31.8%), 95485 has a value of 30.4% which is lower and better.
Lake, CA County Value
(31.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Over time, the 95485 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Zip Code: 95493

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Zip Code: 95493

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95493 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,625 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95493 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.8% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.0%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,884 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (31.8%), 95493 has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Lake, CA County Value
(31.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06033000100

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06033000100

46.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06033000100 has a value of 46.2% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.0%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,997 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06033000100 has a value of 46.2% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,173 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (31.8%), 06033000100 has a value of 46.2% which is higher and worse.
Lake, CA County Value
(31.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Over time, the 06033000100 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06033000300

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06033000300

10.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06033000300 has a value of 10.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.0%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,997 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06033000300 has a value of 10.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,173 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (31.8%), 06033000300 has a value of 10.1% which is lower and better.
Lake, CA County Value
(31.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Over time, the 06033000300 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06033000400

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06033000400

19.3%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06033000400 has a value of 19.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,965 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06033000400 has a value of 19.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.7% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,077 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (31.2%), 06033000400 has a value of 19.3% which is lower and better.
Lake, CA County Value
(31.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Over time, the 06033000400 value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06033000401

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06033000401

13.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06033000401 has a value of 13.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.0%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,997 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06033000401 has a value of 13.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,173 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (31.8%), 06033000401 has a value of 13.3% which is lower and better.
Lake, CA County Value
(31.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06033000402

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06033000402

40.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06033000402 has a value of 40.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.0%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,997 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06033000402 has a value of 40.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,173 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (31.8%), 06033000402 has a value of 40.0% which is higher and worse.
Lake, CA County Value
(31.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06033000501

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06033000501

22.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06033000501 has a value of 22.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.0%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,997 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06033000501 has a value of 22.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,173 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (31.8%), 06033000501 has a value of 22.7% which is lower and better.
Lake, CA County Value
(31.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Over time, the 06033000501 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06033000502

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06033000502

11.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06033000502 has a value of 11.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.0%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,997 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06033000502 has a value of 11.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,173 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (31.8%), 06033000502 has a value of 11.4% which is lower and better.
Lake, CA County Value
(31.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Over time, the 06033000502 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06033000600

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06033000600

26.2%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06033000600 has a value of 26.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,965 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06033000600 has a value of 26.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.7% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,077 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (31.2%), 06033000600 has a value of 26.2% which is lower and better.
Lake, CA County Value
(31.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Over time, the 06033000600 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06033000601

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06033000601

24.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06033000601 has a value of 24.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.0%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,997 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06033000601 has a value of 24.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,173 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (31.8%), 06033000601 has a value of 24.4% which is lower and better.
Lake, CA County Value
(31.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06033000602

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06033000602

32.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06033000602 has a value of 32.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.0%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,997 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06033000602 has a value of 32.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,173 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (31.8%), 06033000602 has a value of 32.0% which is higher and worse.
Lake, CA County Value
(31.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06033000701

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06033000701

36.2%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06033000701 has a value of 36.2% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,965 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06033000701 has a value of 36.2% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.7% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,077 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (31.2%), 06033000701 has a value of 36.2% which is higher and worse.
Lake, CA County Value
(31.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Over time, the 06033000701 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06033000702

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06033000702

56.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06033000702 has a value of 56.8% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.0%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,997 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06033000702 has a value of 56.8% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,173 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (31.8%), 06033000702 has a value of 56.8% which is higher and worse.
Lake, CA County Value
(31.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Over time, the 06033000702 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06033000703

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06033000703

53.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06033000703 has a value of 53.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.0%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,997 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06033000703 has a value of 53.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,173 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (31.8%), 06033000703 has a value of 53.9% which is higher and worse.
Lake, CA County Value
(31.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06033000704

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06033000704

21.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06033000704 has a value of 21.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.0%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,997 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06033000704 has a value of 21.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,173 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (31.8%), 06033000704 has a value of 21.4% which is lower and better.
Lake, CA County Value
(31.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06033000801

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06033000801

37.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06033000801 has a value of 37.3% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.0%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,997 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06033000801 has a value of 37.3% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,173 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (31.8%), 06033000801 has a value of 37.3% which is higher and worse.
Lake, CA County Value
(31.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Over time, the 06033000801 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06033000802

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06033000802

47.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06033000802 has a value of 47.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.0%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,997 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06033000802 has a value of 47.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,173 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (31.8%), 06033000802 has a value of 47.9% which is higher and worse.
Lake, CA County Value
(31.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Over time, the 06033000802 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06033000900

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06033000900

27.4%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06033000900 has a value of 27.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,965 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06033000900 has a value of 27.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.7% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,077 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (31.2%), 06033000900 has a value of 27.4% which is lower and better.
Lake, CA County Value
(31.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Over time, the 06033000900 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06033000901

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06033000901

2.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06033000901 has a value of 2.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.0%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,997 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06033000901 has a value of 2.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,173 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (31.8%), 06033000901 has a value of 2.7% which is lower and better.
Lake, CA County Value
(31.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06033000902

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06033000902

26.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06033000902 has a value of 26.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.0%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,997 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06033000902 has a value of 26.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,173 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (31.8%), 06033000902 has a value of 26.9% which is lower and better.
Lake, CA County Value
(31.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06033001000

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06033001000

48.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06033001000 has a value of 48.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.0%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,997 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06033001000 has a value of 48.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,173 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (31.8%), 06033001000 has a value of 48.6% which is higher and worse.
Lake, CA County Value
(31.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Over time, the 06033001000 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06033001100

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06033001100

34.8%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06033001100 has a value of 34.8% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,965 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06033001100 has a value of 34.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.7% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,077 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (31.2%), 06033001100 has a value of 34.8% which is higher and worse.
Lake, CA County Value
(31.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Over time, the 06033001100 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06033001101

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06033001101

10.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06033001101 has a value of 10.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.0%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,997 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06033001101 has a value of 10.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,173 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (31.8%), 06033001101 has a value of 10.5% which is lower and better.
Lake, CA County Value
(31.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06033001102

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06033001102

33.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06033001102 has a value of 33.8% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.0%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,997 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06033001102 has a value of 33.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,173 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (31.8%), 06033001102 has a value of 33.8% which is higher and worse.
Lake, CA County Value
(31.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06033001200

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06033001200

64.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06033001200 has a value of 64.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.0%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,997 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06033001200 has a value of 64.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,173 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (31.8%), 06033001200 has a value of 64.0% which is higher and worse.
Lake, CA County Value
(31.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Over time, the 06033001200 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06033001300

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06033001300

6.4%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06033001300 has a value of 6.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,965 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06033001300 has a value of 6.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.7% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,077 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (31.2%), 06033001300 has a value of 6.4% which is lower and better.
Lake, CA County Value
(31.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Over time, the 06033001300 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06033001301

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06033001301

19.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06033001301 has a value of 19.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.0%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,997 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06033001301 has a value of 19.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,173 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (31.8%), 06033001301 has a value of 19.5% which is lower and better.
Lake, CA County Value
(31.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06033001302

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06033001302

10.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06033001302 has a value of 10.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.0%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,997 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06033001302 has a value of 10.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,173 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (31.8%), 06033001302 has a value of 10.2% which is lower and better.
Lake, CA County Value
(31.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.

Health / Older Adults

Health / Older Adults

Health / Older Adults

Elder Index (Elderly Household Below Income Threshold)

Value
Compared to:

Health / Older Adults

Elder Index (Elderly Household Below Income Threshold)

Value
Compared to:

Elder Index (Elderly Household Below Income Threshold) County: Lake

Current Value:

Elder Index (Elderly Household Below Income Threshold) County: Lake

37.1%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 37.1% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.6%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (27.7%), Lake has a value of 37.1% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(27.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (37.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (36.8%).
Prior Value
(36.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Economy / Food Insecurity

Economy / Food Insecurity

Economy / Food Insecurity

Households Receiving SNAP with Children

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Food Insecurity

Households Receiving SNAP with Children

Value
Compared to:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children County: Lake

Current Value:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children County: Lake

42.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (53.1%), Lake has a value of 42.9%.
CA Value
(53.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (47.9%), Lake has a value of 42.9%.
US Value
(47.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Lake value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Census Place: Clearlake

Current Value:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Census Place: Clearlake

45.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (42.9%), Clearlake has a value of 45.1%.
Lake, CA County Value
(42.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Compared to the CA Value (53.1%), Clearlake has a value of 45.1%.
CA Value
(53.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (47.9%), Clearlake has a value of 45.1%.
US Value
(47.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Clearlake value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Census Place: Clearlake Oaks

Current Value:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Census Place: Clearlake Oaks

42.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (42.9%), Clearlake Oaks has a value of 42.4%.
Lake, CA County Value
(42.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Compared to the CA Value (53.1%), Clearlake Oaks has a value of 42.4%.
CA Value
(53.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (47.9%), Clearlake Oaks has a value of 42.4%.
US Value
(47.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Clearlake Oaks value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Census Place: Clearlake Riviera

Current Value:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Census Place: Clearlake Riviera

31.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (42.9%), Clearlake Riviera has a value of 31.3%.
Lake, CA County Value
(42.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Compared to the CA Value (53.1%), Clearlake Riviera has a value of 31.3%.
CA Value
(53.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (47.9%), Clearlake Riviera has a value of 31.3%.
US Value
(47.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Clearlake Riviera value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Census Place: Cobb

Current Value:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Census Place: Cobb

42.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (42.9%), Cobb has a value of 42.9%.
Lake, CA County Value
(42.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Compared to the CA Value (53.1%), Cobb has a value of 42.9%.
CA Value
(53.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (47.9%), Cobb has a value of 42.9%.
US Value
(47.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Cobb value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Census Place: Hidden Valley Lake

Current Value:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Census Place: Hidden Valley Lake

20.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (42.9%), Hidden Valley Lake has a value of 20.1%.
Lake, CA County Value
(42.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Compared to the CA Value (53.1%), Hidden Valley Lake has a value of 20.1%.
CA Value
(53.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (47.9%), Hidden Valley Lake has a value of 20.1%.
US Value
(47.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hidden Valley Lake value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Census Place: Kelseyville

Current Value:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Census Place: Kelseyville

49.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (42.9%), Kelseyville has a value of 49.7%.
Lake, CA County Value
(42.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Compared to the CA Value (53.1%), Kelseyville has a value of 49.7%.
CA Value
(53.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (47.9%), Kelseyville has a value of 49.7%.
US Value
(47.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Kelseyville value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Census Place: Lakeport

Current Value:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Census Place: Lakeport

28.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (42.9%), Lakeport has a value of 28.0%.
Lake, CA County Value
(42.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Compared to the CA Value (53.1%), Lakeport has a value of 28.0%.
CA Value
(53.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (47.9%), Lakeport has a value of 28.0%.
US Value
(47.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Lakeport value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Census Place: Lower Lake

Current Value:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Census Place: Lower Lake

100.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (42.9%), Lower Lake has a value of 100.0%.
Lake, CA County Value
(42.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Compared to the CA Value (53.1%), Lower Lake has a value of 100.0%.
CA Value
(53.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (47.9%), Lower Lake has a value of 100.0%.
US Value
(47.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Lower Lake value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Census Place: Lucerne

Current Value:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Census Place: Lucerne

24.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (42.9%), Lucerne has a value of 24.8%.
Lake, CA County Value
(42.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Compared to the CA Value (53.1%), Lucerne has a value of 24.8%.
CA Value
(53.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (47.9%), Lucerne has a value of 24.8%.
US Value
(47.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Lucerne value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Census Place: Middletown

Current Value:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Census Place: Middletown

64.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (42.9%), Middletown has a value of 64.7%.
Lake, CA County Value
(42.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Compared to the CA Value (53.1%), Middletown has a value of 64.7%.
CA Value
(53.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (47.9%), Middletown has a value of 64.7%.
US Value
(47.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Middletown value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Census Place: Nice

Current Value:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Census Place: Nice

19.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (42.9%), Nice has a value of 19.9%.
Lake, CA County Value
(42.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Compared to the CA Value (53.1%), Nice has a value of 19.9%.
CA Value
(53.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (47.9%), Nice has a value of 19.9%.
US Value
(47.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Nice value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Census Place: North Lakeport

Current Value:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Census Place: North Lakeport

66.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (42.9%), North Lakeport has a value of 66.3%.
Lake, CA County Value
(42.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Compared to the CA Value (53.1%), North Lakeport has a value of 66.3%.
CA Value
(53.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (47.9%), North Lakeport has a value of 66.3%.
US Value
(47.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the North Lakeport value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Census Place: Soda Bay

Current Value:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Census Place: Soda Bay

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (42.9%), Soda Bay has a value of 0.0%.
Lake, CA County Value
(42.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Compared to the CA Value (53.1%), Soda Bay has a value of 0.0%.
CA Value
(53.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (47.9%), Soda Bay has a value of 0.0%.
US Value
(47.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Soda Bay value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Census Place: Spring Valley

Current Value:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Census Place: Spring Valley

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (42.9%), Spring Valley has a value of 0.0%.
Lake, CA County Value
(42.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Compared to the CA Value (53.1%), Spring Valley has a value of 0.0%.
CA Value
(53.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (47.9%), Spring Valley has a value of 0.0%.
US Value
(47.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Spring Valley value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Census Place: Upper Lake

Current Value:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Census Place: Upper Lake

48.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (42.9%), Upper Lake has a value of 48.3%.
Lake, CA County Value
(42.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Compared to the CA Value (53.1%), Upper Lake has a value of 48.3%.
CA Value
(53.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (47.9%), Upper Lake has a value of 48.3%.
US Value
(47.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Upper Lake value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Zip Code: 95422

Current Value:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Zip Code: 95422

45.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (42.9%), 95422 has a value of 45.1%.
Lake, CA County Value
(42.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Over time, the 95422 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Zip Code: 95423

Current Value:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Zip Code: 95423

41.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (42.9%), 95423 has a value of 41.9%.
Lake, CA County Value
(42.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Over time, the 95423 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Zip Code: 95426

Current Value:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Zip Code: 95426

51.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (42.9%), 95426 has a value of 51.9%.
Lake, CA County Value
(42.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Over time, the 95426 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Zip Code: 95435

Current Value:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Zip Code: 95435

0.0%
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (41.9%), 95435 has a value of 0.0%.
Lake, CA County Value
(41.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Over time, the 95435 value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Zip Code: 95443

Current Value:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Zip Code: 95443

100.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (42.9%), 95443 has a value of 100.0%.
Lake, CA County Value
(42.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Over time, the 95443 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Zip Code: 95451

Current Value:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Zip Code: 95451

47.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (42.9%), 95451 has a value of 47.1%.
Lake, CA County Value
(42.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Over time, the 95451 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Zip Code: 95453

Current Value:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Zip Code: 95453

44.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (42.9%), 95453 has a value of 44.8%.
Lake, CA County Value
(42.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Over time, the 95453 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Zip Code: 95457

Current Value:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Zip Code: 95457

54.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (42.9%), 95457 has a value of 54.0%.
Lake, CA County Value
(42.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Over time, the 95457 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Zip Code: 95458

Current Value:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Zip Code: 95458

23.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (42.9%), 95458 has a value of 23.2%.
Lake, CA County Value
(42.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Over time, the 95458 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Zip Code: 95461

Current Value:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Zip Code: 95461

55.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (42.9%), 95461 has a value of 55.7%.
Lake, CA County Value
(42.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Over time, the 95461 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Zip Code: 95464

Current Value:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Zip Code: 95464

33.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (42.9%), 95464 has a value of 33.1%.
Lake, CA County Value
(42.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Over time, the 95464 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Zip Code: 95467

Current Value:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Zip Code: 95467

21.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (42.9%), 95467 has a value of 21.2%.
Lake, CA County Value
(42.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Over time, the 95467 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Zip Code: 95485

Current Value:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Zip Code: 95485

38.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (42.9%), 95485 has a value of 38.1%.
Lake, CA County Value
(42.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Over time, the 95485 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Zip Code: 95493

Current Value:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Zip Code: 95493

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (42.9%), 95493 has a value of 0.0%.
Lake, CA County Value
(42.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Census Tract: 06033000100

Current Value:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Census Tract: 06033000100

44.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (42.9%), 06033000100 has a value of 44.1%.
Lake, CA County Value
(42.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Over time, the 06033000100 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Census Tract: 06033000300

Current Value:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Census Tract: 06033000300

73.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (42.9%), 06033000300 has a value of 73.8%.
Lake, CA County Value
(42.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Over time, the 06033000300 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Census Tract: 06033000400

Current Value:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Census Tract: 06033000400

45.8%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (49.4%), 06033000400 has a value of 45.8%.
Lake, CA County Value
(49.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Over time, the 06033000400 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Census Tract: 06033000401

Current Value:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Census Tract: 06033000401

66.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (42.9%), 06033000401 has a value of 66.2%.
Lake, CA County Value
(42.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Census Tract: 06033000402

Current Value:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Census Tract: 06033000402

20.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (42.9%), 06033000402 has a value of 20.3%.
Lake, CA County Value
(42.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Census Tract: 06033000501

Current Value:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Census Tract: 06033000501

20.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (42.9%), 06033000501 has a value of 20.8%.
Lake, CA County Value
(42.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Over time, the 06033000501 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Census Tract: 06033000502

Current Value:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Census Tract: 06033000502

20.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (42.9%), 06033000502 has a value of 20.8%.
Lake, CA County Value
(42.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Over time, the 06033000502 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Census Tract: 06033000600

Current Value:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Census Tract: 06033000600

43.3%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (49.4%), 06033000600 has a value of 43.3%.
Lake, CA County Value
(49.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Over time, the 06033000600 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Census Tract: 06033000601

Current Value:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Census Tract: 06033000601

41.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (42.9%), 06033000601 has a value of 41.8%.
Lake, CA County Value
(42.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Census Tract: 06033000602

Current Value:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Census Tract: 06033000602

58.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (42.9%), 06033000602 has a value of 58.0%.
Lake, CA County Value
(42.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Census Tract: 06033000701

Current Value:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Census Tract: 06033000701

40.1%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (49.4%), 06033000701 has a value of 40.1%.
Lake, CA County Value
(49.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Over time, the 06033000701 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Census Tract: 06033000702

Current Value:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Census Tract: 06033000702

52.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (42.9%), 06033000702 has a value of 52.3%.
Lake, CA County Value
(42.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Over time, the 06033000702 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Census Tract: 06033000703

Current Value:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Census Tract: 06033000703

27.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (42.9%), 06033000703 has a value of 27.4%.
Lake, CA County Value
(42.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Census Tract: 06033000704

Current Value:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Census Tract: 06033000704

68.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (42.9%), 06033000704 has a value of 68.6%.
Lake, CA County Value
(42.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Census Tract: 06033000801

Current Value:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Census Tract: 06033000801

42.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (42.9%), 06033000801 has a value of 42.7%.
Lake, CA County Value
(42.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Over time, the 06033000801 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Census Tract: 06033000802

Current Value:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Census Tract: 06033000802

39.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (42.9%), 06033000802 has a value of 39.2%.
Lake, CA County Value
(42.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Over time, the 06033000802 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Census Tract: 06033000900

Current Value:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Census Tract: 06033000900

57.7%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (49.4%), 06033000900 has a value of 57.7%.
Lake, CA County Value
(49.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Over time, the 06033000900 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Census Tract: 06033000901

Current Value:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Census Tract: 06033000901

9.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (42.9%), 06033000901 has a value of 9.4%.
Lake, CA County Value
(42.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Census Tract: 06033000902

Current Value:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Census Tract: 06033000902

26.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (42.9%), 06033000902 has a value of 26.0%.
Lake, CA County Value
(42.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Census Tract: 06033001000

Current Value:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Census Tract: 06033001000

55.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (42.9%), 06033001000 has a value of 55.9%.
Lake, CA County Value
(42.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Over time, the 06033001000 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Census Tract: 06033001100

Current Value:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Census Tract: 06033001100

11.7%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (49.4%), 06033001100 has a value of 11.7%.
Lake, CA County Value
(49.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Over time, the 06033001100 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Census Tract: 06033001101

Current Value:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Census Tract: 06033001101

52.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (42.9%), 06033001101 has a value of 52.1%.
Lake, CA County Value
(42.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Census Tract: 06033001102

Current Value:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Census Tract: 06033001102

26.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (42.9%), 06033001102 has a value of 26.1%.
Lake, CA County Value
(42.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Census Tract: 06033001200

Current Value:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Census Tract: 06033001200

51.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (42.9%), 06033001200 has a value of 51.9%.
Lake, CA County Value
(42.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Over time, the 06033001200 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Census Tract: 06033001300

Current Value:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Census Tract: 06033001300

38.0%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (49.4%), 06033001300 has a value of 38.0%.
Lake, CA County Value
(49.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Over time, the 06033001300 value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Census Tract: 06033001301

Current Value:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Census Tract: 06033001301

20.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (42.9%), 06033001301 has a value of 20.3%.
Lake, CA County Value
(42.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Census Tract: 06033001302

Current Value:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children Census Tract: 06033001302

59.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (42.9%), 06033001302 has a value of 59.5%.
Lake, CA County Value
(42.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.

Economy / Food Insecurity

Households Receiving SNAP with Children (Count)

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Food Insecurity

Households Receiving SNAP with Children (Count)

Value
Compared to:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children (Count) County: Lake

Current Value:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children (Count) County: Lake

2,082
Households
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Lake value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households Receiving SNAP with Children (Count) Zip Code: 95422

Current Value:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children (Count) Zip Code: 95422

814
Households
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 95422 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households Receiving SNAP with Children (Count) Zip Code: 95423

Current Value:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children (Count) Zip Code: 95423

150
Households
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 95423 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households Receiving SNAP with Children (Count) Zip Code: 95426

Current Value:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children (Count) Zip Code: 95426

55
Households
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 95426 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households Receiving SNAP with Children (Count) Zip Code: 95435

Current Value:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children (Count) Zip Code: 95435

0
Households
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
Over time, the 95435 value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households Receiving SNAP with Children (Count) Zip Code: 95443

Current Value:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children (Count) Zip Code: 95443

30
Households
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 95443 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households Receiving SNAP with Children (Count) Zip Code: 95451

Current Value:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children (Count) Zip Code: 95451

367
Households
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 95451 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households Receiving SNAP with Children (Count) Zip Code: 95453

Current Value:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children (Count) Zip Code: 95453

235
Households
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 95453 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households Receiving SNAP with Children (Count) Zip Code: 95457

Current Value:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children (Count) Zip Code: 95457

75
Households
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 95457 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households Receiving SNAP with Children (Count) Zip Code: 95458

Current Value:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children (Count) Zip Code: 95458

69
Households
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 95458 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households Receiving SNAP with Children (Count) Zip Code: 95461

Current Value:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children (Count) Zip Code: 95461

88
Households
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 95461 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households Receiving SNAP with Children (Count) Zip Code: 95464

Current Value:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children (Count) Zip Code: 95464

55
Households
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 95464 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households Receiving SNAP with Children (Count) Zip Code: 95467

Current Value:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children (Count) Zip Code: 95467

45
Households
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 95467 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households Receiving SNAP with Children (Count) Zip Code: 95485

Current Value:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children (Count) Zip Code: 95485

99
Households
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 95485 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households Receiving SNAP with Children (Count) Zip Code: 95493

Current Value:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children (Count) Zip Code: 95493

0
Households
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 95493 value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households Receiving SNAP with Children (Count) Census Tract: 06033000100

Current Value:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children (Count) Census Tract: 06033000100

112
Households
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06033000100 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households Receiving SNAP with Children (Count) Census Tract: 06033000300

Current Value:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children (Count) Census Tract: 06033000300

124
Households
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06033000300 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households Receiving SNAP with Children (Count) Census Tract: 06033000501

Current Value:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children (Count) Census Tract: 06033000501

57
Households
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06033000501 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households Receiving SNAP with Children (Count) Census Tract: 06033000502

Current Value:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children (Count) Census Tract: 06033000502

42
Households
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06033000502 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households Receiving SNAP with Children (Count) Census Tract: 06033000702

Current Value:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children (Count) Census Tract: 06033000702

229
Households
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06033000702 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households Receiving SNAP with Children (Count) Census Tract: 06033000801

Current Value:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children (Count) Census Tract: 06033000801

160
Households
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06033000801 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households Receiving SNAP with Children (Count) Census Tract: 06033000802

Current Value:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children (Count) Census Tract: 06033000802

244
Households
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06033000802 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households Receiving SNAP with Children (Count) Census Tract: 06033001000

Current Value:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children (Count) Census Tract: 06033001000

358
Households
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06033001000 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households Receiving SNAP with Children (Count) Census Tract: 06033001200

Current Value:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children (Count) Census Tract: 06033001200

80
Households
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06033001200 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Economy / Housing & Homes

Economy / Housing & Homes

Economy / Housing & Homes

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Housing & Homes

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent

Value
Compared to:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent County: Lake

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent County: Lake

52.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 52.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 53.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 55.8%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 52.7% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 49.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (54.4%), Lake has a value of 52.7% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(54.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (49.9%), Lake has a value of 52.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Lake value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place: Clearlake

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place: Clearlake

64.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Clearlake has a value of 64.4% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 53.9% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,360 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Clearlake has a value of 64.4% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 57.1%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,241 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (52.7%), Clearlake has a value of 64.4% which is higher and worse.
Lake, CA County Value
(52.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Compared to the CA Value (54.4%), Clearlake has a value of 64.4% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(54.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (49.9%), Clearlake has a value of 64.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Clearlake value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place: Clearlake Oaks

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place: Clearlake Oaks

63.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Clearlake Oaks has a value of 63.8% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 53.9% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,360 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Clearlake Oaks has a value of 63.8% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 57.1%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,241 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (52.7%), Clearlake Oaks has a value of 63.8% which is higher and worse.
Lake, CA County Value
(52.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Compared to the CA Value (54.4%), Clearlake Oaks has a value of 63.8% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(54.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (49.9%), Clearlake Oaks has a value of 63.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Clearlake Oaks value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place: Clearlake Riviera

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place: Clearlake Riviera

47.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Clearlake Riviera has a value of 47.1% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 53.9% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,360 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Clearlake Riviera has a value of 47.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 57.1%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,241 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (52.7%), Clearlake Riviera has a value of 47.1% which is lower and better.
Lake, CA County Value
(52.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Compared to the CA Value (54.4%), Clearlake Riviera has a value of 47.1% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(54.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (49.9%), Clearlake Riviera has a value of 47.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Clearlake Riviera value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place: Cobb

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place: Cobb

37.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Cobb has a value of 37.5% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 53.9% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,360 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Cobb has a value of 37.5% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 57.1%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,241 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (52.7%), Cobb has a value of 37.5% which is lower and better.
Lake, CA County Value
(52.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Compared to the CA Value (54.4%), Cobb has a value of 37.5% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(54.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (49.9%), Cobb has a value of 37.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Cobb value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place: Hidden Valley Lake

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place: Hidden Valley Lake

62.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Hidden Valley Lake has a value of 62.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 53.9% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,360 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Hidden Valley Lake has a value of 62.5% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 57.1%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,241 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (52.7%), Hidden Valley Lake has a value of 62.5% which is higher and worse.
Lake, CA County Value
(52.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Compared to the CA Value (54.4%), Hidden Valley Lake has a value of 62.5% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(54.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (49.9%), Hidden Valley Lake has a value of 62.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hidden Valley Lake value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place: Kelseyville

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place: Kelseyville

40.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Kelseyville has a value of 40.8% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 53.9% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,360 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Kelseyville has a value of 40.8% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 57.1%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,241 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (52.7%), Kelseyville has a value of 40.8% which is lower and better.
Lake, CA County Value
(52.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Compared to the CA Value (54.4%), Kelseyville has a value of 40.8% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(54.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (49.9%), Kelseyville has a value of 40.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Kelseyville value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place: Lakeport

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place: Lakeport

21.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Lakeport has a value of 21.5% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 53.9% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,360 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Lakeport has a value of 21.5% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 57.1%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,241 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (52.7%), Lakeport has a value of 21.5% which is lower and better.
Lake, CA County Value
(52.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Compared to the CA Value (54.4%), Lakeport has a value of 21.5% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(54.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (49.9%), Lakeport has a value of 21.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Lakeport value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place: Lower Lake

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place: Lower Lake

74.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Lower Lake has a value of 74.1% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 53.9% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,360 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Lower Lake has a value of 74.1% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 57.1%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,241 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (52.7%), Lower Lake has a value of 74.1% which is higher and worse.
Lake, CA County Value
(52.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Compared to the CA Value (54.4%), Lower Lake has a value of 74.1% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(54.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (49.9%), Lower Lake has a value of 74.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Lower Lake value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place: Lucerne

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place: Lucerne

59.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Lucerne has a value of 59.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 53.9% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,360 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Lucerne has a value of 59.8% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 57.1%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,241 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (52.7%), Lucerne has a value of 59.8% which is higher and worse.
Lake, CA County Value
(52.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Compared to the CA Value (54.4%), Lucerne has a value of 59.8% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(54.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (49.9%), Lucerne has a value of 59.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Lucerne value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place: Middletown

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place: Middletown

17.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Middletown has a value of 17.9% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 53.9% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,360 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Middletown has a value of 17.9% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 57.1%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,241 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (52.7%), Middletown has a value of 17.9% which is lower and better.
Lake, CA County Value
(52.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Compared to the CA Value (54.4%), Middletown has a value of 17.9% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(54.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (49.9%), Middletown has a value of 17.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Middletown value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place: Nice

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place: Nice

59.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Nice has a value of 59.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 53.9% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,360 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Nice has a value of 59.3% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 57.1%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,241 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (52.7%), Nice has a value of 59.3% which is higher and worse.
Lake, CA County Value
(52.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Compared to the CA Value (54.4%), Nice has a value of 59.3% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(54.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (49.9%), Nice has a value of 59.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Nice value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)