Skip to main content
Search for Indicators

Access to Health Services

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Adults Delayed or had Difficulty Obtaining Care

Value
Compared to:

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Adults Delayed or had Difficulty Obtaining Care

Value
Compared to:

Adults Delayed or had Difficulty Obtaining Care County: Lake

Current Value:

Adults Delayed or had Difficulty Obtaining Care County: Lake

25.7%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (22.0%), Lake has a value of 25.7% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(22.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (25.7%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (23.8%).
Prior Value
(23.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults Delayed or had Difficulty Obtaining Care Zip Code: 95422

Current Value:

Adults Delayed or had Difficulty Obtaining Care Zip Code: 95422

28.9%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (25.7%), 95422 has a value of 28.9% which is higher and worse.
Lake, CA County Value
(25.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Compared to the prior value, 95422 (28.9%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (26.8%).
Prior Value
(26.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 95422 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults Delayed or had Difficulty Obtaining Care Zip Code: 95423

Current Value:

Adults Delayed or had Difficulty Obtaining Care Zip Code: 95423

25.7%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (25.7%), 95423 has a value of 25.7%.
Lake, CA County Value
(25.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Compared to the prior value, 95423 (25.7%) is less and better than the previously measured value (28.5%).
Prior Value
(28.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 95423 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults Delayed or had Difficulty Obtaining Care Zip Code: 95426

Current Value:

Adults Delayed or had Difficulty Obtaining Care Zip Code: 95426

28.4%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (25.7%), 95426 has a value of 28.4% which is higher and worse.
Lake, CA County Value
(25.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Compared to the prior value, 95426 (28.4%) is less and better than the previously measured value (30.7%).
Prior Value
(30.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 95426 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults Delayed or had Difficulty Obtaining Care Zip Code: 95451

Current Value:

Adults Delayed or had Difficulty Obtaining Care Zip Code: 95451

24.4%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (25.7%), 95451 has a value of 24.4% which is lower and better.
Lake, CA County Value
(25.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Compared to the prior value, 95451 (24.4%) is less and better than the previously measured value (27.8%).
Prior Value
(27.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 95451 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults Delayed or had Difficulty Obtaining Care Zip Code: 95453

Current Value:

Adults Delayed or had Difficulty Obtaining Care Zip Code: 95453

23.8%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (25.7%), 95453 has a value of 23.8% which is lower and better.
Lake, CA County Value
(25.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Compared to the prior value, 95453 (23.8%) is less and better than the previously measured value (26.8%).
Prior Value
(26.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 95453 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults Delayed or had Difficulty Obtaining Care Zip Code: 95457

Current Value:

Adults Delayed or had Difficulty Obtaining Care Zip Code: 95457

24.7%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (25.7%), 95457 has a value of 24.7% which is lower and better.
Lake, CA County Value
(25.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Compared to the prior value, 95457 (24.7%) is less and better than the previously measured value (28.7%).
Prior Value
(28.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 95457 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults Delayed or had Difficulty Obtaining Care Zip Code: 95461

Current Value:

Adults Delayed or had Difficulty Obtaining Care Zip Code: 95461

25.0%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (25.7%), 95461 has a value of 25.0% which is lower and better.
Lake, CA County Value
(25.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Compared to the prior value, 95461 (25.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (29.5%).
Prior Value
(29.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 95461 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults Delayed or had Difficulty Obtaining Care Zip Code: 95464

Current Value:

Adults Delayed or had Difficulty Obtaining Care Zip Code: 95464

26.1%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (25.7%), 95464 has a value of 26.1% which is higher and worse.
Lake, CA County Value
(25.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Compared to the prior value, 95464 (26.1%) is less and better than the previously measured value (29.1%).
Prior Value
(29.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 95464 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults Delayed or had Difficulty Obtaining Care Zip Code: 95467

Current Value:

Adults Delayed or had Difficulty Obtaining Care Zip Code: 95467

22.6%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (25.7%), 95467 has a value of 22.6% which is lower and better.
Lake, CA County Value
(25.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Compared to the prior value, 95467 (22.6%) is less and better than the previously measured value (27.1%).
Prior Value
(27.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 95467 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults Delayed or had Difficulty Obtaining Care Zip Code: 95485

Current Value:

Adults Delayed or had Difficulty Obtaining Care Zip Code: 95485

24.8%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (25.7%), 95485 has a value of 24.8% which is lower and better.
Lake, CA County Value
(25.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Compared to the prior value, 95485 (24.8%) is less and better than the previously measured value (29.3%).
Prior Value
(29.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 95485 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults Delayed or had Difficulty Obtaining Care Zip Code: 95493

Current Value:

Adults Delayed or had Difficulty Obtaining Care Zip Code: 95493

24.2%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the Lake, CA County Value (25.7%), 95493 has a value of 24.2% which is lower and better.
Lake, CA County Value
(25.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Lake County value.
Compared to the prior value, 95493 (24.2%) is less and better than the previously measured value (28.5%).
Prior Value
(28.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 95493 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Children with Health Insurance

Value
Compared to:

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Children with Health Insurance

Value
Compared to:

Children with Health Insurance County: Lake

Current Value:

Children with Health Insurance County: Lake

93.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 93.6% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 97.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 96.2%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 42 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 93.6% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 96.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 93.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 828 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (96.8%), Lake has a value of 93.6% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(96.8%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (94.9%), Lake has a value of 93.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(94.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (93.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (98.6%).
Prior Value
(98.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Medicare Healthcare Costs

Value
Compared to:

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Medicare Healthcare Costs

Value
Compared to:

Medicare Healthcare Costs County: Lake

Current Value:

Medicare Healthcare Costs County: Lake

$8,632
Dollars per enrollee
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value ($9,100), Lake has a value of $8,632.
CA Value
($9,100)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value ($9,729), Lake has a value of $8,632.
US Value
($9,729)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake ($8,632) is greater  than the previously measured value ($8,176).
Prior Value
($8,176)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

People Delayed or had Difficulty Obtaining Care

Value
Compared to:

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

People Delayed or had Difficulty Obtaining Care

Value
Compared to:

People Delayed or had Difficulty Obtaining Care County: Lake

Current Value:

People Delayed or had Difficulty Obtaining Care County: Lake

23.4%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 23.4% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.2%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (16.5%), Lake has a value of 23.4% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(16.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (23.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (23.4%).
Prior Value
(23.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.9%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.9%)

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

People with a Usual Source of Health Care

Value
Compared to:

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

People with a Usual Source of Health Care

Value
Compared to:

People with a Usual Source of Health Care County: Lake

Current Value:

People with a Usual Source of Health Care County: Lake

85.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 85.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 84.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 81.3%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (82.5%), Lake has a value of 85.0% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(82.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (85.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (87.1%).
Prior Value
(87.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Persons with Private Health Insurance Only

Value
Compared to:

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Persons with Private Health Insurance Only

Value
Compared to:

Persons with Private Health Insurance Only County: Lake

Current Value:

Persons with Private Health Insurance Only County: Lake

31.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (53.5%), Lake has a value of 31.7%.
CA Value
(53.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (54.8%), Lake has a value of 31.7%.
US Value
(54.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (31.7%) is less  than the previously measured value (37.1%).
Prior Value
(37.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Persons with Public Health Insurance Only

Value
Compared to:

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Persons with Public Health Insurance Only

Value
Compared to:

Persons with Public Health Insurance Only County: Lake

Current Value:

Persons with Public Health Insurance Only County: Lake

46.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (29.8%), Lake has a value of 46.7%.
CA Value
(29.8%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (24.8%), Lake has a value of 46.7%.
US Value
(24.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (46.7%) is greater  than the previously measured value (35.6%).
Prior Value
(35.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Primary Care Provider Rate

Value
Compared to:

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Primary Care Provider Rate

Value
Compared to:

Primary Care Provider Rate County: Lake

Current Value:

Primary Care Provider Rate County: Lake

42
Providers per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 42 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 46.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 42 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 47 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 29.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,984 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (81), Lake has a value of 42 which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(81)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (42) is less and worse than the previously measured value (45).
Prior Value
(45)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.