Skip to main content
Search for Indicators

All Data

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

County: Lake

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Value
Compared to:

County: Lake

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Value
Compared to:

County: Lake Adults who Binge Drink

Current Value:

County: Lake Adults who Binge Drink

14.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 14.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.8%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 14.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Lake has a value of 14.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Lake Age-Adjusted Annual Opioid Prescription Rate

Current Value:
499.5
Prescriptions per 1,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 499.5 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 371.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 437.5.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (291.0), Lake has a value of 499.5 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(291.0)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (499.5) is less and better than the previously measured value (520.5).
Prior Value
(520.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake Age-Adjusted Buprenorphine Prescription Rate

Current Value:
119.8
Prescriptions per 1,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (19.8), Lake has a value of 119.8.
CA Value
(19.8)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (119.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (119.8).
Prior Value
(119.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to All Opioid Overdose

55.5
Rate per 100,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 55.5 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 25.4.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (18.7), Lake has a value of 55.5 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(18.7)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (55.5) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (49.8).
Prior Value
(49.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Drug Use

Current Value:
77.6
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 77.6 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 31.0.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (21.4), Lake has a value of 77.6 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(21.4)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (77.6) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (66.1).
Prior Value
(66.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Fentanyl Overdose

38.5
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 38.5 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.3.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (16.6), Lake has a value of 38.5 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(16.6)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (38.5) is less and better than the previously measured value (43.3).
Prior Value
(43.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Lake Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Heroin Overdose

13.1
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 13.1 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.6.
CA Counties
(2018)
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (2.4), Lake has a value of 13.1 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(2.4)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (13.1) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (10.6).
Prior Value
(10.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (4.2), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(4.2)

County: Lake Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Prescription Opioid Overdose

55.5
Rate per 100,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 55.5 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.9.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (18.1), Lake has a value of 55.5 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(18.1)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (55.5) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (49.1).
Prior Value
(49.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Synthetic Opioid Overdose (excluding Methadone)

42.2
Rate per 100,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 42.2 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.3.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (16.7), Lake has a value of 42.2 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(16.7)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (42.2) is less and better than the previously measured value (43.3).
Prior Value
(43.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.9), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.9)
<div>IVP-22: Reduce overdose deaths involving synthetic opioids other than methadone</div>

County: Lake Age-Adjusted Drug and Opioid-Involved Overdose Death Rate

59.8
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 59.8 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.0.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 48 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 59.8 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,303 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (16.5), Lake has a value of 59.8 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(16.5)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (23.5), Lake has a value of 59.8 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(23.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (59.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (70.5).
Prior Value
(70.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Lake Age-Adjusted ED Visit Rate due to All Drug Overdose

309.6
Rate per 100,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 309.6 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 141.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 183.3.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (143.7), Lake has a value of 309.6 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(143.7)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (309.6) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (280.7).
Prior Value
(280.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake Age-Adjusted ED Visit Rate due to Heroin Overdose

2.4
Rate per 100,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 2.4 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 5.9.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (3.6), Lake has a value of 2.4 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(3.6)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (2.4) is less and better than the previously measured value (21.3).
Prior Value
(21.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake Age-Adjusted ED Visit Rate due to Opioid Overdose (excluding Heroin)

132.6
Rate per 100,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 132.6 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 70.0.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (54.9), Lake has a value of 132.6 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(54.9)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (132.6) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (14.7).
Prior Value
(14.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to All Drug Overdose

38.8
Rate per 100,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 38.8 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 37.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 45.9.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (48.3), Lake has a value of 38.8 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(48.3)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (38.8) is less and better than the previously measured value (73.5).
Prior Value
(73.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Heroin Overdose

0.0
Rate per 100,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 0.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 0.8.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (0.7), Lake has a value of 0.0 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(0.7)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (0.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (6.3).
Prior Value
(6.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Opioid Overdose (excluding Heroin)

10.6
Rate per 100,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 10.6 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.8.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (12.1), Lake has a value of 10.6 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(12.1)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (10.6) is less and better than the previously measured value (14.7).
Prior Value
(14.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake Age-Adjusted Long Acting or Extended Release Opioid Prescription Rate to Opioid Naive Residents

2.6
Per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 2.6 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (1.2), Lake has a value of 2.6 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(1.2)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (2.6) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (3.0).
Prior Value
(3.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake Death Rate due to Drug Poisoning

Current Value:
81.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 81.0 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.1.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 54 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 81.0 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,899 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (22.0), Lake has a value of 81.0 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(22.0)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (27.2), Lake has a value of 81.0 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(27.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (20.7), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(20.7)
<div>SU-03: Reduce drug overdose deaths <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

County: Lake Hospitalizations due to Substance Use Age 15 to 24

1,329.2
(2013-2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (793.4), Lake has a value of 1,329.2 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(793.4)
The regional value is compared to the state value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (1,329.2) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (899.1).
Prior Value
(899.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Lake Opioid Deaths

Current Value:

County: Lake Opioid Deaths

26
Persons
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Lake (26) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (17).
Prior Value
(17)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake Opioid Prescription Patients

Current Value:
4.2%
(Q3 2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 4.2% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.6%.
CA Counties
(Q2 2022)
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (4.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (4.2%).
Prior Value
(4.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake Quarterly Opioid Prescription Rate

Current Value:
518.8
Prescriptions per 10,000 population
(Q3 2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 518.8 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 330.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 440.1.
CA Counties
(Q2 2022)
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (518.8) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (506.8).
Prior Value
(506.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake Residents on More than 90 Morphine Milligram Equivalents (MME) of Opioids Daily

13.0
Residents on >90 MMEs of Opioids per 1,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 13.0 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.9.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (6.3), Lake has a value of 13.0 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(6.3)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (13.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (14.5).
Prior Value
(14.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake

Health / Cancer

Value
Compared to:

County: Lake

Health / Cancer

Value
Compared to:

County: Lake Adults with Cancer

Current Value:

County: Lake Adults with Cancer

8.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 8.6% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.5%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 8.6% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Lake has a value of 8.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Lake Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Breast Cancer

Current Value:
20.3
Deaths per 100,000 females
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 20.3 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.9.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 56 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (17.8), Lake has a value of 20.3 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(17.8)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (20.0), Lake has a value of 20.3 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(20.0 in 2016)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is National Cancer Institute
Compared to the prior value, Lake (20.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (19.9).
Prior Value
(19.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (15.3), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(15.3)

County: Lake Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cancer

Current Value:
170.1
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 170.1 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 131.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 143.2.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (124.9), Lake has a value of 170.1 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(124.9)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (155.9), Lake has a value of 170.1 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(155.9 in 2016)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is National Cancer Institute
Compared to the prior value, Lake (170.1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (178.4).
Prior Value
(178.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (122.7), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(122.7)

County: Lake Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Colorectal Cancer

15.2
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 15.2 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.5.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 52 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 15.2 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.4.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,174 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (12.1), Lake has a value of 15.2 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(12.1)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (13.1), Lake has a value of 15.2 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(13.1)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (15.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (15.8).
Prior Value
(15.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.9), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.9)

County: Lake Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Lung Cancer

Current Value:
41.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 41.4 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.7.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (21.6), Lake has a value of 41.4 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(21.6)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (38.5), Lake has a value of 41.4 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(38.5 in 2016)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is National Cancer Institute
Compared to the prior value, Lake (41.4) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (42.0).
Prior Value
(42.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.1), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.1)

County: Lake Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Prostate Cancer

22.8
Deaths per 100,000 males
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 22.8 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.6.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,576 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (19.8), Lake has a value of 22.8 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(19.8)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (18.8), Lake has a value of 22.8 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(18.8)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (22.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (24.6).
Prior Value
(24.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (16.9), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(16.9)

County: Lake Breast Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
129.3
Cases per 100,000 females
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 129.3 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 121.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 129.6.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 56 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 129.3 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 122.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 133.5.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,478 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (121.0), Lake has a value of 129.3 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(121.0)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (127.0), Lake has a value of 129.3 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(127.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (129.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (121.5).
Prior Value
(121.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake Cancer: Medicare Population

Current Value:
9.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 9.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 9.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (11.0%), Lake has a value of 9.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Lake has a value of 9.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (9.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (9.0%).
Prior Value
(9.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake Cervical Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
13.3
Cases per 100,000 females
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 13.3 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.1.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 40 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 13.3 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.1.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 696 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (7.3), Lake has a value of 13.3 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(7.3)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (7.5), Lake has a value of 13.3 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(7.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (13.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (12.0).
Prior Value
(12.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Lake Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65

Current Value:
81.6%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 81.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 81.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 80.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 81.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 81.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), Lake has a value of 81.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(82.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Lake Colon Cancer Screening

Current Value:

County: Lake Colon Cancer Screening

66.5%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 66.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 67.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 64.5%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 66.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), Lake has a value of 66.5% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Lake Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation

Current Value:
62.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 62.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 62.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 60.1%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 62.2% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 70.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 67.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), Lake has a value of 62.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Lake Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
38.5
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 38.5 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 33.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.2.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 56 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 38.5 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 46.1.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,401 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (33.5), Lake has a value of 38.5 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(33.5)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (36.5), Lake has a value of 38.5 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(36.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (38.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (37.3).
Prior Value
(37.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
64.8
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 64.8 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 39.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 47.4.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 55 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 64.8 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 63.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 74.4.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,471 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (37.6), Lake has a value of 64.8 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(37.6)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (54.0), Lake has a value of 64.8 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(54.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (64.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (66.7).
Prior Value
(66.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74

Current Value:
65.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 65.8% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 67.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 66.4%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 65.8% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 70.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 67.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Lake has a value of 65.8% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

County: Lake Mammography Screening: Medicare Population

Current Value:
37.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 37.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 41.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 38.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 37.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 45.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 40.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,123 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (41.0%), Lake has a value of 37.0% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(41.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (47.0%), Lake has a value of 37.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(47.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (37.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (35.0%).
Prior Value
(35.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake Oral Cavity and Pharynx Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
14.0
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 14.0 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.0.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 54 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 14.0 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.1.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,706 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (10.1), Lake has a value of 14.0 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(10.1)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (11.9), Lake has a value of 14.0 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.9)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (14.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (15.4).
Prior Value
(15.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake Prostate Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
83.9
Cases per 100,000 males
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 83.9 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 93.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 102.0.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 83.9 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 107.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 125.6.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,500 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (95.4), Lake has a value of 83.9 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(95.4)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (110.5), Lake has a value of 83.9 which is lower and better.
US Value
(110.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (83.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (80.7).
Prior Value
(80.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake

Health / Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

County: Lake

Health / Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

County: Lake Adults with Diabetes

Current Value:

County: Lake Adults with Diabetes

8.9%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 8.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.9%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (10.7%), Lake has a value of 8.9% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(10.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (11.5%), Lake has a value of 8.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.5% in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Compared to the prior value, Lake (8.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.7%).
Prior Value
(11.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Diabetes

Current Value:
15.1
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 15.1 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.8.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (23.1), Lake has a value of 15.1 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(23.1)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (24.8), Lake has a value of 15.1 which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.8 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Lake (15.1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (14.6).
Prior Value
(14.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Lake Diabetes: Medicare Population

Current Value:
19.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 19.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 25.3%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 19.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (21.0%), Lake has a value of 19.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (24.0%), Lake has a value of 19.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (19.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (18.0%).
Prior Value
(18.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake

Health / Disabilities

Value
Compared to:

County: Lake

Health / Disabilities

Value
Compared to:

County: Lake Adults with Disability

Current Value:

County: Lake Adults with Disability

49.1%
(2016)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (29.7%), Lake has a value of 49.1%.
CA Value
(29.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (20.6%), Lake has a value of 49.1%.
US Value
(20.6% in 2015)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Compared to the prior value, Lake (49.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (53.4%).
Prior Value
(53.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake Adults with Disability Living in Poverty

Current Value:
31.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 31.8% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.1%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 31.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (22.7%), Lake has a value of 31.8% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(22.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Lake has a value of 31.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Lake value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake Children with a Disability

Current Value:
5.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (3.7%), Lake has a value of 5.7%.
CA Value
(3.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (4.5%), Lake has a value of 5.7%.
US Value
(4.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Lake value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty

Current Value:
7.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (4.6%), Lake has a value of 7.7%.
CA Value
(4.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (5.3%), Lake has a value of 7.7%.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Lake value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake Persons with a Disability

Current Value:
19.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (11.0%), Lake has a value of 19.8%.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Lake has a value of 19.8%.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Lake value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake Persons with a Hearing Difficulty

Current Value:
7.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (2.9%), Lake has a value of 7.1%.
CA Value
(2.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (3.6%), Lake has a value of 7.1%.
US Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Lake value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty

Current Value:
5.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (2.7%), Lake has a value of 5.1%.
CA Value
(2.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (2.6%), Lake has a value of 5.1%.
US Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Lake value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake Persons with a Vision Difficulty

Current Value:
3.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (2.1%), Lake has a value of 3.6%.
CA Value
(2.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (2.4%), Lake has a value of 3.6%.
US Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Lake value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty

Current Value:
10.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (5.8%), Lake has a value of 10.7%.
CA Value
(5.8%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (6.7%), Lake has a value of 10.7%.
US Value
(6.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Lake value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake

Health / Family Planning

Value
Compared to:

County: Lake

Health / Family Planning

Value
Compared to:

County: Lake Teen Birth Rate: 15-19

Current Value:

County: Lake Teen Birth Rate: 15-19

23.0
Live births per 1,000 females aged 15-19
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 23.0 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.6.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 55 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (10.3), Lake has a value of 23.0 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(10.3)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (13.9), Lake has a value of 23.0 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(13.9 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics
Compared to the prior value, Lake (23.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (22.9).
Prior Value
(22.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Value
Compared to:

County: Lake

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Value
Compared to:

County: Lake Adults Delayed or had Difficulty Obtaining Care

25.7%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (22.0%), Lake has a value of 25.7% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(22.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (25.7%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (23.8%).
Prior Value
(23.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake Adults who have had a Routine Checkup

Current Value:
65.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 65.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 63.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.8%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 65.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (73.6%), Lake has a value of 65.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(73.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Lake Adults with Health Insurance: 18-64

Current Value:
89.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 89.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 89.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 89.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 88.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 82.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (90.2%), Lake has a value of 89.8% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(90.2%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (89.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (90.7%).
Prior Value
(90.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake Adults without Health Insurance

Current Value:
10.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 10.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 10.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (10.8%), Lake has a value of 10.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Lake Children and Teens Delayed or had Difficulty Obtaining Care

8.9%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (8.7%), Lake has a value of 8.9% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(8.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (8.9%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (7.2%).
Prior Value
(7.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake Children with Health Insurance

Current Value:
93.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 93.6% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 97.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 96.2%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 42 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 93.6% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 96.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 93.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 828 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (96.8%), Lake has a value of 93.6% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(96.8%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (94.9%), Lake has a value of 93.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(94.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (93.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (98.6%).
Prior Value
(98.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake Community Spending on Health Care

Current Value:
9.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (6.4%), Lake has a value of 9.0%.
CA Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (8.0%), Lake has a value of 9.0%.
US Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (9.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (9.0%).
Prior Value
(9.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Lake Health Insurance Spending-to-Income Ratio

Current Value:
8.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 8.1% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.9%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 8.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (5.0%), Lake has a value of 8.1% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (8.1%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (8.0%).
Prior Value
(8.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Lake Medicare Healthcare Costs

Current Value:
$8,632
Dollars per enrollee
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value ($9,100), Lake has a value of $8,632.
CA Value
($9,100)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value ($9,729), Lake has a value of $8,632.
US Value
($9,729)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake ($8,632) is greater  than the previously measured value ($8,176).
Prior Value
($8,176)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake Non-Physician Primary Care Provider Rate

Current Value:
78
Providers per 100,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 78 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 86 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 67.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 78 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 94 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 65.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (87), Lake has a value of 78 which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(87)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (78) is greater and better than the previously measured value (73).
Prior Value
(73)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake People Delayed or had Difficulty Obtaining Care

23.4%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 23.4% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.2%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (16.5%), Lake has a value of 23.4% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(16.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (23.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (23.4%).
Prior Value
(23.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.9%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.9%)

County: Lake People with a Usual Source of Health Care

Current Value:
85.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 85.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 84.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 81.3%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (82.5%), Lake has a value of 85.0% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(82.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (85.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (87.1%).
Prior Value
(87.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake Persons with Health Insurance

Current Value:
91.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 91.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 92.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 91.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 91.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 89.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (91.9%), Lake has a value of 91.7% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(91.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (91.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (92.3%).
Prior Value
(92.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (92.4%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(92.4%)
<div>AHS-01: Increase the proportion of people with health insurance <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

County: Lake Persons with Private Health Insurance Only

Current Value:
31.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (53.5%), Lake has a value of 31.7%.
CA Value
(53.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (54.8%), Lake has a value of 31.7%.
US Value
(54.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (31.7%) is less  than the previously measured value (37.1%).
Prior Value
(37.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake Persons with Public Health Insurance Only

Current Value:
46.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (29.8%), Lake has a value of 46.7%.
CA Value
(29.8%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (24.8%), Lake has a value of 46.7%.
US Value
(24.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (46.7%) is greater  than the previously measured value (35.6%).
Prior Value
(35.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population

2,041.0
Discharges per 100,000 Medicare enrollees
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 2,041.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2,111.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2,576.5.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 2,041.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2,729.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3,374.5.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (2,275.0), Lake has a value of 2,041.0 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(2,275.0)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (2,677.0), Lake has a value of 2,041.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(2,677.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (2,041.0) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (2,031.0).
Prior Value
(2,031.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake Primary Care Provider Rate

Current Value:
42
Providers per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 42 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 46.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 42 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 47 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 29.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,984 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (81), Lake has a value of 42 which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(81)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (42) is less and worse than the previously measured value (45).
Prior Value
(45)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake

Health / Health Information Technology

Value
Compared to:

County: Lake

Health / Health Information Technology

Value
Compared to:

County: Lake Households with an Internet Subscription

Current Value:
83.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 83.9% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 89.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 86.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 83.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 83.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (91.6%), Lake has a value of 83.9% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(91.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (88.5%), Lake has a value of 83.9% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(88.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Lake value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake Households with One or More Types of Computing Devices

92.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 92.4% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 94.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 93.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 92.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 88.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (95.9%), Lake has a value of 92.4% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(95.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (94.0%), Lake has a value of 92.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(94.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Lake value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake Persons with an Internet Subscription

Current Value:
87.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 87.4% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 92.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 88.9%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 87.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 87.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 83.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (93.4%), Lake has a value of 87.4% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(93.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (91.0%), Lake has a value of 87.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(91.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Lake value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Value
Compared to:

County: Lake

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Value
Compared to:

County: Lake Adults who Experienced a Stroke

Current Value:
4.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 4.2% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.7%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 4.2% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (3.3%), Lake has a value of 4.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(3.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Lake Adults who Experienced Coronary Heart Disease

Current Value:
8.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 8.3% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.3%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 8.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (6.1%), Lake has a value of 8.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(6.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Lake Adults who Have Taken Medications for High Blood Pressure

77.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 77.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.2%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 77.5% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 80.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 78.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Lake has a value of 77.5% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Lake Adults with Heart Disease

Current Value:
11.7%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (6.9%), Lake has a value of 11.7% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(6.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (11.7%) is less and better than the previously measured value (18.2%).
Prior Value
(18.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cerebrovascular Disease (Stroke)

31.9
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 31.9 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 37.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 42.5.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (37.2), Lake has a value of 31.9 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(37.2)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (38.8), Lake has a value of 31.9 which is lower and better.
US Value
(38.8 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Lake (31.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (33.8).
Prior Value
(33.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (33.4), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(33.4)

County: Lake Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Coronary Heart Disease

112.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 112.0 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 80.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 98.6.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (79.0), Lake has a value of 112.0 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(79.0)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (91.8), Lake has a value of 112.0 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(91.8 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Lake (112.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (109.0).
Prior Value
(109.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (71.1), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(71.1)

County: Lake Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Heart Attack

Current Value:
46.8
Deaths per 100,000 population 35+ years
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 46.8 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 50.0.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (44.3), Lake has a value of 46.8 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(44.3)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (46.8) is less and better than the previously measured value (50.5).
Prior Value
(50.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Heart Attack

19.9
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population 35+ years
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 19.9 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.0.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (21.1), Lake has a value of 19.9 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(21.1)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (19.9) is less and better than the previously measured value (22.4).
Prior Value
(22.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population

Current Value:
13.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 13.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 13.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (13.0%), Lake has a value of 13.0%.
CA Value
(13.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (14.0%), Lake has a value of 13.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (13.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (13.0%).
Prior Value
(13.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake Cholesterol Test History

Current Value:
85.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 85.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 85.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 82.9%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 85.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 84.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 82.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (86.4%), Lake has a value of 85.5% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(86.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Lake Heart Failure: Medicare Population

Current Value:
10.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 10.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 10.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (10.0%), Lake has a value of 10.0%.
CA Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Lake has a value of 10.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (10.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (10.0%).
Prior Value
(10.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake High Blood Pressure Prevalence

Current Value:
57.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 57.4% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 37.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 42.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (34.8%), Lake has a value of 57.4% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(34.8%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (32.4%), Lake has a value of 57.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(32.4% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Compared to the prior value, Lake (57.4%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (31.9%).
Prior Value
(31.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (41.9%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(41.9%)

County: Lake High Cholesterol Prevalence: Past 5 Years

Current Value:
39.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 39.3% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 35.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 38.5%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 39.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 38.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 40.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (36.4%), Lake has a value of 39.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(36.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Lake Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population

Current Value:
55.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 55.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 61.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 55.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 63.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 67.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (61.0%), Lake has a value of 55.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(61.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (65.0%), Lake has a value of 55.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (55.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (52.0%).
Prior Value
(52.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake Hypertension: Medicare Population

Current Value:
56.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 56.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 59.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 62.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 56.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 67.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 71.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (58.0%), Lake has a value of 56.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(58.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (65.0%), Lake has a value of 56.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (56.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (55.0%).
Prior Value
(55.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population

Current Value:
17.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 17.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 17.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (18.0%), Lake has a value of 17.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (21.0%), Lake has a value of 17.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (17.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (17.0%).
Prior Value
(17.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake Stroke: Medicare Population

Current Value:
4.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 4.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 5.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 4.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (5.0%), Lake has a value of 4.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Lake has a value of 4.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (4.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (4.0%).
Prior Value
(4.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

Value
Compared to:

County: Lake

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

Value
Compared to:

County: Lake Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Influenza and Pneumonia

10.7
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 10.7 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.3.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (11.5), Lake has a value of 10.7 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(11.5)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (13.0), Lake has a value of 10.7 which is lower and better.
US Value
(13.0 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Lake (10.7) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (13.6).
Prior Value
(13.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake COVID-19 Daily Average Case-Fatality Rate

Current Value:
0.0
Deaths per 100 cases
(Mar 3, 2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 0.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 1.3.
CA Counties
(Feb 3, 2023)
The distribution is based on data from 56 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 0.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.3.
U.S. Counties
(Mar 25, 2022)
The distribution is based on data from 2,811 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (1.0), Lake has a value of 0.0 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(1.0)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (1.7), Lake has a value of 0.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (0.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0.0).
Prior Value
(0.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake COVID-19 Daily Average Incidence Rate

Current Value:
3.92
Cases per 100,000 population
(Mar 3, 2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 3.92 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.99 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.75.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 3.92 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.84 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.01.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (6.23), Lake has a value of 3.92 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(6.23)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (10.97), Lake has a value of 3.92 which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.97)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (3.92) is less and better than the previously measured value (5.16).
Prior Value
(5.16)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population

Current Value:
33.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 33.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 44.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 36.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 33.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 43.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 36.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (48.0%), Lake has a value of 33.0% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(48.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (50.0%), Lake has a value of 33.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(50.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (33.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (32.0%).
Prior Value
(32.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake Kindergartners with Required Immunizations

Current Value:
93.9%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 93.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 94.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 90.5%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 56 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (92.8%), Lake has a value of 93.9% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(92.8%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (93.9%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (91.7%).
Prior Value
(91.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake Persons Fully Vaccinated Against COVID-19

Current Value:
61.1%
(May 10, 2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 61.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 63.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 55.8%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 50 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 61.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 52.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 44.1%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,125 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (61.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (61.1%).
Prior Value
(61.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population

Current Value:
4.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 4.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 7.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 6.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 4.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 5.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (8.0%), Lake has a value of 4.0% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (8.0%), Lake has a value of 4.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (4.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (4.0%).
Prior Value
(4.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake

Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health

Value
Compared to:

County: Lake

Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health

Value
Compared to:

County: Lake Any In-Hospital Breastfeeding

Current Value:
94.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 94.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 94.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 89.6%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (93.8%), Lake has a value of 94.1% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(93.8%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (94.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (91.0%).
Prior Value
(91.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake Babies with Low Birthweight

Current Value:
8.1%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 8.1% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.5%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (7.2%), Lake has a value of 8.1% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(7.2%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (8.5%), Lake has a value of 8.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(8.5% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Lake (8.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.2%).
Prior Value
(7.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake Hospitalizations due to Substance Use for Pregnant Females Age 15-44

96.9
(2013-2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (19.9), Lake has a value of 96.9 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(19.9)
The regional value is compared to the state value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (96.9) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (50.1).
Prior Value
(50.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Lake In-Hospital Exclusive Breastfeeding

Current Value:
69.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 69.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 58.9%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (68.5%), Lake has a value of 69.2% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(68.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (69.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (60.9%).
Prior Value
(60.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake Infant Mortality Rate

Current Value:

County: Lake Infant Mortality Rate

8.4
Deaths per 1,000 live births
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (4.2), Lake has a value of 8.4 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(4.2)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (5.6), Lake has a value of 8.4 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(5.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Lake (8.4) is less and better than the previously measured value (11.2).
Prior Value
(11.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.0), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.0)
<div>MICH-02: Reduce the rate of infant deaths <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

County: Lake Mothers who Breastfeed

Current Value:

County: Lake Mothers who Breastfeed

93.5%
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 93.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 95.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 92.8%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (93.8%), Lake has a value of 93.5% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(93.8%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (93.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (92.8%).
Prior Value
(92.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake Mothers who Received Early Prenatal Care

Current Value:
79.1%
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 79.1% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 84.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 80.3%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (87.9%), Lake has a value of 79.1% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(87.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (78.3%), Lake has a value of 79.1% which is higher and better.
US Value
(78.3% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Lake (79.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (76.9%).
Prior Value
(76.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake Preterm Births

Current Value:

County: Lake Preterm Births

10.2%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 10.2% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.4%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (9.0%), Lake has a value of 10.2% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(9.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (10.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (9.0%).
Prior Value
(9.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (9.4%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(9.4%)

County: Lake

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Value
Compared to:

County: Lake

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Value
Compared to:

County: Lake Adults Ever Diagnosed with Depression

Current Value:
20.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 20.9% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.6%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 20.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (19.5%), Lake has a value of 20.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(19.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Lake Adults Needing and Receiving Behavioral Health Care Services

56.8%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 56.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 60.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 55.8%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (55.9%), Lake has a value of 56.8% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(55.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (56.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (58.8%).
Prior Value
(58.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake Adults Who Ever Thought Seriously About Committing Suicide

29.1%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 29.1% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.1%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (19.0%), Lake has a value of 29.1% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(19.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (29.1%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (16.3%).
Prior Value
(16.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake Adults with Likely Serious Psychological Distress

18.1%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 18.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.7%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (16.7%), Lake has a value of 18.1% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (18.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (15.7%).
Prior Value
(15.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Suicide

Current Value:
23.9
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 23.9 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.6.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (10.3), Lake has a value of 23.9 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(10.3)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (13.5), Lake has a value of 23.9 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(13.5 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Lake (23.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (25.4).
Prior Value
(25.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (12.8), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(12.8)
<div>MHMD-01: Reduce the suicide rate <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

County: Lake Depression: Medicare Population

Current Value:
12.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 12.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 12.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (14.0%), Lake has a value of 12.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (16.0%), Lake has a value of 12.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (12.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (12.0%).
Prior Value
(12.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake Frequent Mental Distress

Current Value:
15.6%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 15.6% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.7%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 15.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,121 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (12.0%), Lake has a value of 15.6% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (14.0%), Lake has a value of 15.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (15.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (16.1%).
Prior Value
(16.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Lake Mental Health Provider Rate

Current Value:
380
Providers per 100,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 380 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 401 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 259.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 380 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 137 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 62.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,956 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (450), Lake has a value of 380 which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(450)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (380) is greater and better than the previously measured value (375).
Prior Value
(375)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake Poor Mental Health: 14+ Days

Current Value:
16.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 16.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.6%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 16.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (14.7%), Lake has a value of 16.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(14.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Lake

Health / Mortality Data

Value
Compared to:

County: Lake

Health / Mortality Data

Value
Compared to:

County: Lake Life Expectancy

Current Value:

County: Lake Life Expectancy

74.6
Years
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 74.6 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 78.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 76.5.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 74.6 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 73.6.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,070 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (79.9), Lake has a value of 74.6 which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(79.9)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (77.6), Lake has a value of 74.6 which is lower and worse.
US Value
(77.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Lake

Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating

Value
Compared to:

County: Lake

Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating

Value
Compared to:

County: Lake Adult Fast Food Consumption

Current Value:
48.5%
(2016)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 48.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 59.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 69.4%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (65.6%), Lake has a value of 48.5% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(65.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (48.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (49.7%).
Prior Value
(49.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake Adults who Drink Sugar-Sweetened Beverages

Current Value:
15.1%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (13.7%), Lake has a value of 15.1% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (15.1%) is less and better than the previously measured value (16.4%).
Prior Value
(16.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake

Health / Older Adults

Value
Compared to:

County: Lake

Health / Older Adults

Value
Compared to:

County: Lake Adult Day Care Spending-to-Income Ratio

Current Value:
15.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 15.6% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.8%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 15.6% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (13.4%), Lake has a value of 15.6% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(13.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (15.6%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (15.5%).
Prior Value
(15.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Lake Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Females

29.9%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 29.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 31.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 28.6%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 29.9% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 36.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 33.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (37.9%), Lake has a value of 29.9% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(37.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Lake Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Males

36.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 36.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 38.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 35.4%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 36.8% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 42.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 39.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (43.7%), Lake has a value of 36.8% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(43.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Lake Adults 65+ with a Disability

Current Value:
39.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (33.5%), Lake has a value of 39.8%.
CA Value
(33.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), Lake has a value of 39.8%.
US Value
(33.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Lake value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty

Current Value:
18.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (12.9%), Lake has a value of 18.8%.
CA Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (13.7%), Lake has a value of 18.8%.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Lake value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty

Current Value:
11.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (9.5%), Lake has a value of 11.4%.
CA Value
(9.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (7.4%), Lake has a value of 11.4%.
US Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Lake value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty

Current Value:
7.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (6.1%), Lake has a value of 7.8%.
CA Value
(6.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Lake has a value of 7.8%.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Lake value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty

15.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (16.4%), Lake has a value of 15.9%.
CA Value
(16.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (13.6%), Lake has a value of 15.9%.
US Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Lake value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population

3.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 3.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 5.3%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 3.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (5.0%), Lake has a value of 3.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Lake has a value of 3.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (3.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (4.0%).
Prior Value
(4.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake Elder Index (Elderly Household Below Income Threshold)

37.1%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 37.1% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.6%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (27.7%), Lake has a value of 37.1% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(27.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (37.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (36.8%).
Prior Value
(36.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake

Health / Oral Health

Value
Compared to:

County: Lake

Health / Oral Health

Value
Compared to:

County: Lake Adults 65+ with Total Tooth Loss

Current Value:
12.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 12.4% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.1%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 12.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (13.4%), Lake has a value of 12.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(13.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Lake Adults who Visited a Dentist

Current Value:
61.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 61.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 62.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 58.4%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 61.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 60.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (64.8%), Lake has a value of 61.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(64.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Lake Dentist Rate

Current Value:

County: Lake Dentist Rate

44
Dentists per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 44 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 80 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 58.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 44 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 43 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 27.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,054 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (93), Lake has a value of 44 which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(93)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (44) is greater and better than the previously measured value (42).
Prior Value
(42)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake

Health / Other Conditions

Value
Compared to:

County: Lake

Health / Other Conditions

Value
Compared to:

County: Lake Adults with Arthritis

Current Value:

County: Lake Adults with Arthritis

30.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 30.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 23.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.7%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 30.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 30.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (25.2%), Lake has a value of 30.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(25.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Lake Adults with Kidney Disease

Current Value:
4.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 4.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.7%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 4.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (3.1%), Lake has a value of 4.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(3.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Lake Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population

Current Value:
13.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 13.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 13.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (16.0%), Lake has a value of 13.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (18.0%), Lake has a value of 13.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (13.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (13.0%).
Prior Value
(13.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake Osteoporosis: Medicare Population

Current Value:
7.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 7.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 7.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (13.0%), Lake has a value of 7.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(13.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Lake has a value of 7.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (7.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (6.0%).
Prior Value
(6.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population

27.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 27.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 31.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 27.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 35.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 38.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (32.0%), Lake has a value of 27.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(32.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (35.0%), Lake has a value of 27.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(35.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (27.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (26.0%).
Prior Value
(26.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake

Health / Physical Activity

Value
Compared to:

County: Lake

Health / Physical Activity

Value
Compared to:

County: Lake Adults 20+ who are Sedentary

Current Value:
17.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 17.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.9%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 17.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (17.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (19.6%).
Prior Value
(19.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake

Health / Prevention & Safety

Value
Compared to:

County: Lake

Health / Prevention & Safety

Value
Compared to:

County: Lake Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Firearms

Current Value:
14.9
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 14.9 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.8.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 45 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 14.9 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.4.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,083 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (7.4), Lake has a value of 14.9 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(7.4)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (12.0), Lake has a value of 14.9 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (14.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (21.0).
Prior Value
(21.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (10.7), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(10.7)

County: Lake Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Unintentional Injuries

134.6
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 134.6 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 53.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 70.9.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (43.4), Lake has a value of 134.6 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(43.4)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (57.6), Lake has a value of 134.6 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(57.6 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Lake (134.6) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (109.1).
Prior Value
(109.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (43.2), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(43.2)

County: Lake

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Value
Compared to:

County: Lake

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Value
Compared to:

County: Lake Adults with Asthma

Current Value:

County: Lake Adults with Asthma

9.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 9.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (17.0%), Lake has a value of 9.8% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(17.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (15.7%), Lake has a value of 9.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Compared to the prior value, Lake (9.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (14.6%).
Prior Value
(14.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake Adults with COPD

Current Value:

County: Lake Adults with COPD

9.2%
Percent of adults
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 9.2% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.7%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 9.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (6.4%), Lake has a value of 9.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Lake Adults with Current Asthma

Current Value:
10.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 10.5% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.2%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 10.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (9.7%), Lake has a value of 10.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(9.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Lake Asthma: Medicare Population

Current Value:
5.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 5.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 5.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (7.0%), Lake has a value of 5.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Lake has a value of 5.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (5.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.0%).
Prior Value
(5.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake Children and Teens with Asthma

Current Value:
14.7%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (12.3%), Lake has a value of 14.7% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(12.3%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (14.7%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (7.8%).
Prior Value
(7.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Lake COPD: Medicare Population

Current Value:
11.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 11.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 11.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (8.0%), Lake has a value of 11.0% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Lake has a value of 11.0%.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (11.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (12.0%).
Prior Value
(12.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake

Health / Sexually Transmitted Infections

Value
Compared to:

County: Lake

Health / Sexually Transmitted Infections

Value
Compared to:

County: Lake Chlamydia Incidence Rate

Current Value:
356.9
Cases per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 356.9 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 344.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 485.7.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (484.7), Lake has a value of 356.9 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(484.7)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (495.5), Lake has a value of 356.9 which is lower and better.
US Value
(495.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Lake (356.9) is less and better than the previously measured value (382.6).
Prior Value
(382.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake Congenital Syphilis Incidence Rate

Current Value:
285.7
Cases per 100,000 live births
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 285.7 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 46.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 151.4.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (114.9), Lake has a value of 285.7 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(114.9)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (285.7) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (136.6).
Prior Value
(136.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (33.9), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(33.9)

County: Lake Death Rate Among Persons with Diagnosed HIV Infection

9.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 9.4 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.8.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (5.4), Lake has a value of 9.4 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(5.4)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (9.4) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (6.2).
Prior Value
(6.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake Gonorrhea Incidence Rate

Current Value:
248.2
Cases per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 248.2 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 140.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 212.7.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (230.9), Lake has a value of 248.2 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(230.9)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (214.0), Lake has a value of 248.2 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(214.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Lake (248.2) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (175.6).
Prior Value
(175.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Lake HIV Diagnosis Rate

Current Value:

County: Lake HIV Diagnosis Rate

6.2
Cases per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake has a value of 6.2 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.4.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (12.2), Lake has a value of 6.2 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(12.2)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (6.2) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (1.6).
Prior Value
(1.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.